|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jack Icegaard
   |
Posted - 2007.04.08 18:29:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Taurevanime
I think the best proof of the matter that nos is overpowered is the fact that what you use to counter someone nossing you is nossing them. Unlike with ECM and such which you have ECCM to counter, there is nothing that reduces the effectiveness of a nos. Not your apparent lack of size or your flying speed.
The prevalance of nos modules in setups shows just how far it's gone.
In my own personal oppinion I'd rather see nos gone, the neutralisers are a much more balanced module, they'll reduce enemy cap while not adding to your own. But they should also get something like a signature resolution to make the larger ones less effective against smaller ships.
Sorry, but this is horse hockey 
NOS is a weapon. Its a high-slot module and an alternative to a turret or a launcher. Turrets are far more commonly used and that proves what? That turrets are overpowered?
-Of course not. Its good for the game that there are more options than just launchers and turrets for the high slots. Its good for the game that there are alternative approaches to combat that just trying to out- damage/tank your opponent.
You guys tries really hard to make your arguments sound credible. There seems to be the idea here that if people whine enough about something, that will by itself prove that there is a real issue. What those nerf brigands don't realize is that the EVE community has many different groups with different interests and many of them want to change the game in a way that favor their particular way of playing. They are proponent with an agenda that serves themselves. But they try their best to pimp up their argument to sound as if they arguing for the greater good of the game.
If i was a Dev here i would be concerned about the prevailing perception that CCP will "Knee jerk" if the whining is persistent enough.
We have a new nerf-NOS-thread every week. And there is very seldom anything new.
"look how much we are whining, surely our nerf agenda must have merit"
|
Jack Icegaard
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 20:54:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Jack Icegaard on 08/04/2007 21:03:29
Originally by: Maya Rkell
And you felt the need to counter what you consider spamming with a post rubishing it? Right.
If someone who knows that a subject has been debated over and over at these forums, posts a new thread about it, without bringing anything new to the table, it is spamming IMO. If people thinks that quantity of posts will make a difference it gives an incitement for spamming which makes these forums somewhat tedious to read. That was just an observation of the frequent threads concerning NOS ( i did not mean to say that you were spamming and maybe "horse hockey" was a bit harsh  )
|
Jack Icegaard
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 09:25:00 -
[3]
What CCP is going to do to deal with the "NOS issue" is that they are starting a new server called "Mutant ninja turtle -EVE" On that server there will be no modules that require any type outside the box thinking or tactics more than "approach and shoot".
Also, all factions will get the same ships, just in different skins and with different names. So nothing will be overpowered.
If you dont like NOS you gonna love it!
oh, and this is not a flame bait btw
|
Jack Icegaard
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 09:50:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Piky Denmark
Yeah right - Go suck some NPC wrecks with your mystic behavior
Edit: Forgot this: 
Um, did i just get pwnd? im not sure 
My mystic behavior??
|
|
|
| |
|